As medical and recreational marijuana proposals hit the ballots in many states (recreational votes in Arizona, California, Maine, Massachusetts and Nevada with medical decision on the ballots in Arkansas, Florida, Montana, and North Dakota) we compare the two sides of the argument. Some recent articles submit the anti-marijuana stance with the medical and social implications that dwarf alcohol issues versus pro-marijuana that argues that marijuana is less dangerous than alcohol. Many would argue that the economic benefits to states and cities outweigh any negative aspect. The tax revenue is certainly substantial but some downplay the importance;
"But the extra income is just one drop in a very large bucket, according to Joe Henchman, vice president for legal and state projects at the Tax Foundation."It's certainly quite a bit of revenue," Henchman told NBC News. "It's enough to pay for some extra police or some extra teachers, but you're just not going to be able to replace many of your other taxes with that revenue."
It might be a good idea to watch the 60 minutes piece that shows small cities in Colorado that are dealing with the recreational pot business. I think that all Americans can agree at least this is in the hands of the people.
